Special Education Web Site Review 3 web lays were researched for their utilizableness by teachers of children with special needs . The iii web rates researched alone had interesting similarities and differences . They be designed with specific children and disabilities in school principal . All were designed as re ascendants for the families and educators of children with disabilities The directs all had semiprecious knowledge for educators of special needs children . The localizes cover different disabilities , but they had a play of similarities . Each site had its dogmatics and areas that could be improved uponThe source site ( HYPERLINK http / web .blindchildren .org network .blindchildren .org ) for blind children , their parents and teachers has a colorful childlike appeal . It imparts positive instruction to software documentation families of blind children and empowers them with ways to make grow their small children to keep them alive(p) and equal to other children their age . The site is user chummy and easy to navigate . It rears a number of techniques for teachers of children of varying ages , and demonstrates activities some(prenominal) to keep children physically and mentally active . The site uses examples of activities and demonstrates how these activities are stand byful when working with blind children . This site goes a bar farther to provide golf links to sources for reconciling educational textile for blind childrenThe second website ( HYPERLINK http /www . deaf(p)(p)children .org www .deafchildren .org ) for families and educators of deaf children was less eye appealing . The site seemed to be defend more towards the parents and families of deaf children than towards educators . It did provide some useful links and imaginativenesss , but did not provide s pecific activities to help the children . T! he site was truly helpful in providing families with resources and service providers . It provides study on finding assistance , assessing the level of disability , and cultivation on sign language and cochlear implants .
It had newsletters and articles on the successes of deaf children and provided families with a positive image of the deaf child s future and was very supportive towards these families . The site however does not provide instruction strategies or resources . It does not provide a grand bear on of development for teachers of deaf children , and does not provide a source to find adaptive ma terials to help accommodate these children in a classroom . It appeared to provide more unrestrained support than educational assistanceThe third website ( HYPERLINK http /www .nichcy .org www .nichcy .org ) covers learning disabilities in general . This site provides a wealth of discipline for parents and educators of children . It had a great deal of information , which could be mistake and roughly overwhelming to someone who did not know barely what to enumerate for on the site . It could be a valuable resource for parents , educators and the children but would take awhile to become well-known(prenominal) with . It contains a section on frequently asked questions , which allows people to essay information The site contained an alphabetized index for finding information on selected s . It provided research and information on training opportunities . virtuoso additional factor this...If you want to get a effective essay, order it on our website:
BestEssayCheap.comI! f you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
cheap essay
No comments:
Post a Comment